ChronoFramevsPimcore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Pimcore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 3 883 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.
Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →Pimcore details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Pimcore, compare it with