ChronoFramevspenpot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 61 814 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +1 472 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
penpot ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot is growing faster right now (+1 472 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →penpot details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep penpot, compare it with