# ChronoFrame vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 2 292 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +141 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

PanWatch is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-panwatch