# ChronoFrame vs OpenWA

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | OpenWA |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 16 333 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWA scores 77/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

OpenWA is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [OpenWA](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-openwa