ChronoFramevsOpenWA
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | OpenWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 16 333 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWA scores 77/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
OpenWA is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →OpenWA details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep OpenWA, compare it with