ChronoFramevsopenpanel-co
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | openpanel-co | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 10 in Control Panel |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 766 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.0.19 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 55/100 for openpanel-co, so it is the safer default.
openpanel-co ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; openpanel-co needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →openpanel-co details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep openpanel-co, compare it with