ChronoFramevsoctelium
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | octelium | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #22 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 4 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.
octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →octelium details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep octelium, compare it with