ChronoFramevsNextcloud Memories
Two self-hosted Photo Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Nextcloud Memories | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #3 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 3 867 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v10.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Nextcloud Memories scores 69/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Nextcloud Memories ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Nextcloud Memories needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →Nextcloud Memories details →All Photo Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Nextcloud Memories, compare it with