ChronoFramevsnetbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | netbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 21 781 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +189 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.7.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
netbox scores 79/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
netbox ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; netbox needs more configuration.
netbox is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →netbox details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep netbox, compare it with