# ChronoFrame vs Kokoro FastAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Kokoro FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 5 607 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +132 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-kokoro-fastapi