# chroma vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 29 596 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for chroma.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-woodpecker-ci