# chroma vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 29 596 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for chroma.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-uusec-waf