# chroma vs Tuleap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | Tuleap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #11 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 601 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | — |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 64/100 for Tuleap, so it is the safer default.

chroma ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tuleap.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; Tuleap needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [Tuleap](https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-tuleap