# chroma vs Trenova

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | Trenova |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 601 ✓ | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.

Trenova ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for chroma.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [Trenova](https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-trenova