# chroma vs tiledesk

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | tiledesk |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #46 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 29 603 ✓ | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +234 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | 1.2.1 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Mustache |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 51/100 for tiledesk, so it is the safer default.

chroma ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tiledesk.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; tiledesk needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [tiledesk](https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-tiledesk