# chroma vs Taskosaur

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | Taskosaur |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #37 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 604 ✓ | 576 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +235 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.1.2 · 22 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 42/100 for Taskosaur, so it is the safer default.

chroma ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Taskosaur.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; Taskosaur needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+235 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [Taskosaur](https://selfhost.directory/project/taskosaur) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/taskosaur.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-taskosaur