# chroma vs spotify-saver

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | spotify-saver |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 600 ✓ | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +231 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 ✓ | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.

chroma ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for spotify-saver.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; spotify-saver needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+231 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [spotify-saver](https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-spotify-saver