# chroma vs sink

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | sink |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #5 of 23 in URL Shortener |
| GitHub stars | 29 600 ✓ | 7 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +231 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.3.1 · 27 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 68/100 for sink, so it is the safer default.

sink ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for chroma.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; sink needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+231 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [sink](https://selfhost.directory/project/sink) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sink.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-sink