# chroma vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chroma | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 29 596 ✓ | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

chroma scores 79/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.

chroma ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

chroma is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chroma](https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chroma.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chroma-vs-sdnext