# chmonitor vs gigapipe

> Two self-hosted [Datadog alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/datadog), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chmonitor | gigapipe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 40 in Database Management | #37 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 305 | 1 719 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | chm-v0.1.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | v5.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

gigapipe scores 61/100 against 53/100 for chmonitor, so it is the safer default.

gigapipe ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for chmonitor.

If you want the quickest setup, chmonitor is easier to run; gigapipe needs more configuration.

gigapipe is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chmonitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/chmonitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chmonitor.md)
- [gigapipe](https://selfhost.directory/project/gigapipe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gigapipe.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chmonitor-vs-gigapipe