# chmonitor vs coroot

> Two self-hosted [Datadog alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/datadog), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chmonitor | coroot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 305 | 7 994 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | chm-v0.1.5 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.28.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

coroot scores 69/100 against 53/100 for chmonitor, so it is the safer default.

coroot ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for chmonitor.

coroot is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chmonitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/chmonitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chmonitor.md)
- [coroot](https://selfhost.directory/project/coroot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coroot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chmonitor-vs-coroot