# Chinese Webfont Project vs Homebox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Chinese Webfont Project | Homebox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Asset Management | #1 of 11 in Inventory Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 485 | 7 664 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +295 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Homebox scores 74/100 against 52/100 for Chinese Webfont Project, so it is the safer default.

Homebox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Chinese Webfont Project.

If you want the quickest setup, Homebox is easier to run; Chinese Webfont Project needs more configuration.

Homebox is growing faster right now (+295 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Chinese Webfont Project](https://selfhost.directory/project/chinese-free-web-font-storage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chinese-free-web-font-storage.md)
- [Homebox](https://selfhost.directory/project/homebox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/homebox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chinese-free-web-font-storage-vs-homebox