# Chia Network vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Chia Network | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 10 795 | 93 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 256 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.7.5 · 14 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 72/100 for Chia Network, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Chia Network.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Chia Network needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Chia Network](https://selfhost.directory/project/chia-network) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chia-network.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chia-network-vs-uptime-kuma