# Checkup vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Checkup | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 3 461 | 93 036 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 54/100 for Checkup, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Checkup.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Checkup needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Checkup](https://selfhost.directory/project/checkup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/checkup.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/checkup-vs-uptime-kuma