checkmatevszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| checkmate | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 007 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +120 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.13.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 72/100 for checkmate, so it is the safer default.
checkmate ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, checkmate is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
checkmate is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).
checkmate details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep checkmate, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with