# CheapSecurity vs go2rtc

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CheapSecurity | go2rtc |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 14 522 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +276 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.0 · 20 Sept 2026 | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 45/100 for CheapSecurity, so it is the safer default.

go2rtc ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for CheapSecurity.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; CheapSecurity needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CheapSecurity](https://selfhost.directory/project/cheapsecurity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cheapsecurity.md)
- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cheapsecurity-vs-go2rtc