# chatwoot vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 38 531 ✓ | 16 064 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 370 ✓ | +241 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 370 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap