# chatwoot vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 38 515 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 354 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 354 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-windows-arm