# chatwoot vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 38 531 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 370 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 370 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-uusec-waf