# chatwoot vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 38 512 | 65 400 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 390 ✓ | +459 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 87/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.

If you want the quickest setup, Traefik is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-traefik