# chatwoot vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 38 512 ✓ | 24 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 390 ✓ | +789 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 83/100 for temporal, so it is the safer default.

chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-temporal