# chatwoot vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 505 | 114 255 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 383 | +3 546 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.

chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-supabase