# chatwoot vs signoz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | signoz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 38 562 ✓ | 32 475 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 401 ✓ | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.148.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 79/100 for signoz, so it is the safer default.

signoz ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.

If you want the quickest setup, signoz is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 401 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [signoz](https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-signoz