# chatwoot vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 538 ✓ | 14 671 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 377 ✓ | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | C |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 78/100 for Radarr, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 377 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-radarr