# chatwoot vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 38 572 ✓ | 35 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 411 ✓ | +511 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 82/100 for qdrant, so it is the safer default.

chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 411 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-qdrant