# chatwoot vs Playerr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | Playerr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #17 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 38 505 ✓ | 180 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 383 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.4.8 · 3 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | C |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 45/100 for Playerr, so it is the safer default.

chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Playerr.

If you want the quickest setup, Playerr is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 383 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [Playerr](https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-playerr