# chatwoot vs paperclip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | paperclip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #4 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 38 550 | 108 501 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 389 | +25 677 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.

chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.

If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 677 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-paperclip