# chatwoot vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatwoot | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 38 512 ✓ | 20 539 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 390 ✓ | +303 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 18 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

chatwoot scores 84/100 against 79/100 for MediaMTX, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.

chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatwoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatwoot.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatwoot-vs-mediamtx