# chatterbox-tts-api vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted [Text to Speech projects](https://selfhost.directory/text-to-speech), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chatterbox-tts-api | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 694 | 92 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 711 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 53/100 for chatterbox-tts-api, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for chatterbox-tts-api.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chatterbox-tts-api](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatterbox-tts-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatterbox-tts-api.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatterbox-tts-api-vs-omnivoice-studio