chatterbox-tts-apivsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted Text to Speech projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatterbox-tts-api | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 694 | 92 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 574 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 53/100 for chatterbox-tts-api, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for chatterbox-tts-api.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 574 stars in 30 days).
chatterbox-tts-api details →OmniVoice-Studio details →All Text to Speech projects →
Swap a project
Keep chatterbox-tts-api, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with