# ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy vs hermes-agent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy | hermes-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 89/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 69 in AI Chat | #1 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 6 801 | 258 049 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +9 626 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 36 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.26.8 · 29 Sept 2026 | v0.22.5 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

hermes-agent scores 89/100 against 63/100 for ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy, so it is the safer default.

hermes-agent ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy.

If you want the quickest setup, hermes-agent is easier to run; ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy needs more configuration.

hermes-agent is growing faster right now (+9 626 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-web-midjourney-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-web-midjourney-proxy.md)
- [hermes-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/hermes-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hermes-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatgpt-web-midjourney-proxy-vs-hermes-agent