# ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy vs DeepSeek Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy | DeepSeek Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 69 in AI Chat | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 801 | 264 716 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 724 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.26.8 · 29 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 63/100 for ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy, so it is the safer default.

ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-web-midjourney-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-web-midjourney-proxy.md)
- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatgpt-web-midjourney-proxy-vs-deepseek-harness