# ChatGPT Next Web vs rss-to-activitypub

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChatGPT Next Web | rss-to-activitypub |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 88 910 ✓ | 582 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 44/100 for rss-to-activitypub, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; rss-to-activitypub needs more configuration.

ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChatGPT Next Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web.md)
- [rss-to-activitypub](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-to-activitypub) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-to-activitypub.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatgpt-next-web-vs-rss-to-activitypub