# ChatGPT Next Web vs QMReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChatGPT Next Web | QMReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 88 910 ✓ | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.

QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ChatGPT Next Web.

If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.

ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChatGPT Next Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web.md)
- [QMReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatgpt-next-web-vs-qmreader