# ChatGPT Next Web vs magic-frame

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChatGPT Next Web | magic-frame |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 88 909 ✓ | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.

magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ChatGPT Next Web.

If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.

ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChatGPT Next Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web.md)
- [magic-frame](https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatgpt-next-web-vs-magic-frame