# ChatGPT Next Web vs fosscord

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChatGPT Next Web | fosscord |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #15 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 88 911 ✓ | 6 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +105 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 63/100 for fosscord, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; fosscord needs more configuration.

ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+105 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChatGPT Next Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web.md)
- [fosscord](https://selfhost.directory/project/fosscord) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fosscord.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatgpt-next-web-vs-fosscord