# ChatGPT Next Web vs DeepSeek Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChatGPT Next Web | DeepSeek Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 88 909 | 264 377 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +8 385 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 85/100 for ChatGPT Next Web, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 385 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChatGPT Next Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chatgpt-next-web.md)
- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chatgpt-next-web-vs-deepseek-harness