# chat-ui vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chat-ui | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 69 in AI Chat | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 11 002 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +38 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.10.0 · 11 May 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

chat-ui scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for chat-ui.

If you want the quickest setup, chat-ui is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

chat-ui is growing faster right now (+38 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chat-ui](https://selfhost.directory/project/chat-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chat-ui.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chat-ui-vs-windows-arm