# chat-ui vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | chat-ui | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 69 in AI Chat | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 11 003 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +40 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.10.0 · 11 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

chat-ui scores 72/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

chat-ui ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, chat-ui is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

chat-ui is growing faster right now (+40 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [chat-ui](https://selfhost.directory/project/chat-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chat-ui.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chat-ui-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api