ChartDBvs心潮动态心智系统
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | 心潮动态心智系统 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; 心潮动态心智系统 needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →心潮动态心智系统 details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep 心潮动态心智系统, compare it with